In her novel Charlotte Bronte details and develops the life and experiences of narrator and main character William Crimsworth

In her novel The Professor, author Charlotte Bronte details and develops the keep and experiences of narrator and main persona William Crimsworth. After graduating from Eton College in England, Crimsworth is in motivation of an occupation. He stubbornly refuses offers from his uncles, and consequently finds himself with no other cho screwball than to produce for his tyrannical brother in the menial position of clerk. However, his settings soon receive unbearable, and with an acquaintances recommendation, William secures himself employment as a professor at a boys school in Brussels.Williams arrival in Belgium presents him with new opportunities ii professionally and personally, as he approximately without delay meets two women who be to lurch his existence dramatically Zoraide Reuter and Frances Henri. Bronte creates and emphasizes many differences and similarities between these two women using versatile techniques and methods, which primarily include comparison and con trast. Zoraide and Frances severally have their own epoch-making and soulfulness place in the life of and interaction with William Crimsworth.Each char possesses different kinds of carnal and mental attri exceptes, comes from a unique setting, and enters into and affects his life in a contrasting way. These differences, along with a few similarities, are explored through and through the authors use of imagery and irony. Initially, Zoraide and Frances make involved in Crimsworths life in completely dissimilar ways. These conditions reflect a hint of irony, as their initial roles are complete reversals of their ultimate functions.Zoraide and Williams initial encounter is one that has been pose by her mother, who has offered him a t all(prenominal)ing position at the girls school everyplace which Zoraide presides as directress. Thus, Zoraide appears suddenly and pronouncedly the importance of her and Crimsworths interactions, and her influence upon his life and form are imme diately made evident. Their kin is established as one in which she is his superior both in position and in age. However, a wild-eyed possibility is also suggested in the scene containing their introduction. While walking in concert in her garden, William implicitly compares Mdlle.Reuters form to the well-trimmed beds and budding shrubberies of her garden, and her complexion to the bloom on a good apple (108). William and Zoraides affections are further developed in this subjective setting, as the majority of their romantic interactions take place in her garden, a sort of forbidden Garden of Eden into which she allows him access. The nature and embed imagery that pervades his descriptions is continued throughout the novel and is also used in portrayals of the other primarily influential reference point in his life Mdlle. Frances Henri. As opposed to the entrance of Mdlle.Reuter, Frances arrives in Williams life quietly and without notice as a sewing instructor of whom he has pr eviously observed but never taken notice. This condition is made evident in his statement, A maitresse I sometimes saw but of her I never had a more than passing glimpse I had no opportunity of perusal her suit or observing her person (132-133). Her important and influential role develops gradually throughout the subsequent months. She later becomes one of his pupils, thus establishing their relationship as one in which William is the superior he is the authoritarian t separatelyer and she the submissive student.However, as her intellect and admirable nature soon become apparent, Crimsworths regard and affection for her grow and develop. In response to his newly displayed attentions and consideration, Frances blossoms both physically and mentally. This nurturing relationship is manifested in the metaphor that compares her to a plant and Crimsworth to its lovingness gardener (176). In yet another nature-related metaphor, she is compared to a lost embellish nestling in the mossy a nd mouldy roots of yew-trees (194).Crimsworths many descriptions of each woman play an integral role in the development of both their physical features and mental attributes. Although plant and floral imagery is used in the portrayals of both women, there are metaphors drawn between other natural elements that highlight the differences between them. An aspect of descriptive imagery in which the two women differ completely, is that of fire and temperature. Zoraide is invariably being related to coldness and ice her gaze is described as hard, dark, her eye as glittering with nobody of a irrupt ever kindled in its temperate gleaming (180,183).Furthermore, as William becomes further acquainted with Mdlle. Reuter, she essentially withers as her trustworthy nature is disc everywhereed. This condition is made evident when she and Crimsworth return to the bench in her garden, once a place of affection and fascination for him, which has now been alter into a location of cold, stirred emptiness, due to his discovery of her real character (181-185). Zoraides true nature is a manipulative one, which is exhibited and manifested several times in the course of the novel through her actions.For example, upon realizing that she has lost Crimsworths regard (due to her own manipulations and dishonesty), Zoraide immediately results to underhanded methods in an attempt to regain his affection. She uses false flattery of William, and reproach and condescension of Frances hidden under a guise of concern in order to elevate her own status and appearance ( ). In contrast, Frances is constantly being associated with warmth and fire her eye is portrayed as effloresce and light, her countenance as bright and warm, glowing in the animated boot shining in the expansive light of the summer sun flash lamp out urning almost like fire (195). Mdlle.Henri is likened to fire, light, and warmth over and over again throughout the novel, as the silent possessor of a flame of passion (196) . As a further testimony to the importance of their association, without Crimsworth, she has liberal wasted and pale, her blaze humbled to embers (195, 196). This imagery further reiterates the appropriateness of her and Crimsworths relationship, as he himself is often described as the possessor of an inward fire, his heart tan and hot within him (181).Such interactions and descriptions develop the nature and character of the virtuoso relationships of the work. As far as character is concerned, Mdlle. Reuter and Mdlle. Henri have defining character traits that are quite opposite from one another. The true nature of each woman is made evident as the novel progresses and their respective relationships with William develop. The aspect of these internal characteristics, in turn, contributes to Crimsworths desire for each woman.Although it is Zoraide to who he is initially attracted, her inconsistencies and alter nature result in a short and meaningless romance. Her carriage is agg ressive and noticeable she makes her romantic feelings for Crimsworth obvious, and then engages in psychological and emotional games with him. They participate in an almost cat and mouse relationship, with each individual constantly trying to gain the upper hand and outsmart the other. Williams affections for and compaction with her are short-lived as a result of her deceitful character and lack of integrity.Frances, on the other hand, possesses much more dignity and unimportance than Zoraide, and never engages in deceitful and base actions. She maintains a quiet and demure, almost unnoticeable existence. Her feelings for William are not discovered until much later in the novel, and are not revealed as a result of her actions but are rather made known through his own pursuits. The more endure and true love is formed with Frances, who is the possessor of redeeming and admirable qualities-she is the physique of all that composes a truly good individual.These characteristics form th e kind of buttocks upon which a steady and real love can be based, and thus, it is this relationship that develops harmoniously and remains intact throughout the novel. Her love and compassion stop the marriage just as Mdlle. Reuters dishonesty and selfishness ensure her downfall. Another tincture of irony enters the novel here, as it is Mdlle. Reuter who has had a more formal and correct upbringing, while Mdlle. Henri was raised in virtual poverty and want, with almost no formal education. Thus, it should be Zoraide who is the possessor of these more lady-like qualities.This difference in background and its end result further reflects the contrasts in the inherent nature of each woman, elevating the readers view Frances and reducing that of Zoraide. In the final chapters of The Professor, Frances finds herself in the position of directress of a school that she and William have founded and thus maintains the same occupation as Mdlle. Zoraide. This condition serves to heighten bo th the similarities and contrasts of the two women. Bronte characterizes and explores the two primary women characters of Zoraide Reuter and Frances Henri in her work The Professor through the use of comparison and contrast.These two individuals are delimit through their relationship with the narrator and main character, William Crimsworth. These interactions are developed through the revelation of certain characteristics and information that pertain specifically to each woman. In turn, imagery and irony develop and add depth to these qualities, which include physical and mental attributes, background and history, and intrinsic disposition and nature. Without the skillful use of these devices, the characters in the novel would not appear so realistic and possess much(prenominal) a great degree of depth and complexity.